Case Study: Multi-Style Human Hair Wig Wholesale Program

Evidence scope: buyer specification / project brief. This anonymized account uses the requirements supplied for the project. It does not claim a completed sample approval, manufacturing inspection, shipment or repeat order without the corresponding record.

Buyer Context

An anonymized European wholesale buyer specified a coordinated human-hair programme across three style families. The public record focuses on assortment and quantity allocation; client identity, prices, document numbers and private delivery details are excluded.

Project Scope — Recorded Length and Quantity Matrix

Style Length mix Quantity allocation Style total
Bone Straight 12 / 14 / 16 / 18 in 40 pcs per length 160 pcs
Pixie 16 / 18 / 20 / 24 in 40 pcs per length 160 pcs
Deep Wave 20 / 22 / 24 / 26 / 28 in 40 pcs per length 200 pcs

The recorded matrix contains 13 style-length combinations and totals 520 pieces. These quantities describe this project brief, not VAYORA’s MOQ, current stock or capacity.

Procurement Challenge

The assortment combines a compact straight range, a Pixie range and longer Deep Wave lengths. Style names alone do not define a production specification. Each combination needs its own line identity while the total remains reconciled to one order matrix.

Specification Development

The table records the confirmed style, nominal length and quantity fields. Lace area, cap construction, density, finished weight, colour allocation and attachment details are not added because the reviewed brief does not establish them.

The earlier material direction is not presented as a verified raw-material result. Supporting project documentation and sample evaluation are needed before any material claim is confirmed.

Sample / Approval

The available brief does not establish an approved sample or a revision history. A buyer evaluating a similar programme should record the sample version, required changes and final approved reference before production release.

Manufacturing / QC

No project-specific inspection report or pass result is published here. For a similar order, agree construction-specific checks against the approved specification and sample; retain the inspection record rather than treating a product description as evidence of compliance.

Review the quality-control framework.

Packaging / SKU / Logistics

For a comparable order, separate style and length fields on the SKU record, then reconcile packing quantities to the 160 / 160 / 200 allocation. Packing-list, label, carton and shipment evidence have not been supplied for publication; no dispatch or delivery outcome is claimed.

Outcome — What the Available Record Establishes

The evidence establishes a multi-style procurement specification and quantity plan. It does not establish buyer sales, shipment completion, QC results or repeat purchasing.

What Buyers Can Learn

A length matrix makes allocation review concrete. Keep style-specific sample and inspection references separate, and reconcile totals across quotation, specification and packing documents before approving release.

Related Commercial Pages

Explore wholesale wig programmes, brand collection development and custom wig manufacturing. Use the specification-sheet guide when building the technical record.

Buyer Questions

Does the 520-piece matrix represent a standard minimum order?

No. It is the recorded allocation for this project brief. Minimum quantities and commercial terms depend on the confirmed project.

Does this case confirm shipment or repeat orders?

No. The public evidence supports the specification and quantity structure only; no shipment or repeat-order result is claimed.

Browse sourcing project briefs and workflow examples →

Discuss a Similar Sourcing Project

Share the product scope, SKU matrix, sample references, packaging requirements and delivery instructions for your project.

Request a Quote

Scroll to Top